Cisco EA Restructure: 28% Annual Savings

The Situation

A Fortune 500 financial services firm had been a Cisco Enterprise Agreement customer for six years. Its EA covered networking (DNA Advantage), collaboration (Webex Suite), security (SecureX, Umbrella, Duo), and data centre (Application Centric Infrastructure) — an expansive portfolio that had been accumulated primarily through reactive purchasing rather than strategic planning.

With the EA's three-year term approaching expiry, Cisco's account team presented a renewal proposal at an annualised rate 14% higher than the existing commitment — citing general price increases, AI feature additions to several suites, and the expansion of Cisco's security portfolio under its Splunk integration. The firm's IT procurement team recognised immediately that the proposal contained both inflated module counts and features never deployed, but lacked the Cisco-specific benchmarking data to mount an effective counter-position.

IT Negotiations was engaged eight weeks before the contract expiry deadline. The engagement window was tight — but sufficient to restructure the commercial position before the firm was pushed into a renewal on Cisco's terms.

The Challenges

Cisco EA renewals present several structural challenges that procurement teams frequently underestimate. Our team identified four areas requiring specific resolution:

• Module scope inflation over the EA term. Six distinct Cisco modules included in the renewal proposal had been added to the EA mid-term — either as part of bundle upsells or through standalone purchases that Cisco's account team had folded into the EA without formal consumption review. Three of these modules — including two security components — had never been operationally deployed. Cisco's renewal proposal priced them at their full committed quantity as though they were active assets.
• Webex Suite over-provisioning. The firm had licensed Webex Suite for its entire headcount at the time of the original EA — approximately 18,000 employees. Workforce reductions over the three-year term had reduced the active headcount to 14,600. Cisco's renewal proposal maintained the original user count. This single over-provision represented over $900,000 in avoidable annual spend.
• DNA Advantage vs DNA Essentials mismatch. The firm's campus networking estate had been migrated partially to cloud-managed infrastructure (Meraki), reducing its dependency on on-premise DNA Centre features delivered through DNA Advantage. For a significant portion of the estate, DNA Essentials at a lower per-device price was the appropriate tier — a tier Cisco's account team had not proposed.
• Pricing benchmarking gap. The firm had no independent benchmarking data for Cisco EA pricing. Cisco's account team had presented the renewal proposal as representing a "negotiated discount" from list price — but without comparable benchmark data, the firm had no basis to challenge whether the discount was commercially competitive for an enterprise of its size and tenure.

Our Approach

IT Negotiations deployed a two-person team: a Cisco commercial specialist with direct experience of EA pricing architecture and module structure, and a negotiation lead who had previously worked on the buy side of several large Cisco renewals. The engagement ran across three sequential workstreams over 12 weeks.

Workstream 1 — Consumption and Entitlement Audit. Working with the firm's IT operations and collaboration teams, we produced a current-state inventory mapping licensed quantities against documented deployments for every module in the EA. The analysis confirmed that six modules had zero or near-zero deployment rates. We also identified the Webex user count discrepancy and prepared a structured comparison between the DNA Advantage estate and the portions eligible for DNA Essentials downgrade.

Workstream 2 — Commercial Benchmarking. We applied our proprietary Cisco pricing benchmark data — drawn from EA renewals across comparable enterprise customers — to establish what a commercially competitive renewal should look like for this firm's scale, tenure, and consumption profile. The benchmark analysis showed that the firm's proposed renewal pricing was 22–31% above market rates for its peer group. This data formed the backbone of our negotiation position with Cisco's regional commercial team.

Workstream 3 — EA Restructure Negotiation. We presented Cisco's account team and regional sales director with a structured counter-proposal: removal of the six undeployed modules, correction of the Webex user count to reflect current headcount, downgrade of the appropriate networking devices to DNA Essentials, and a pricing adjustment to market-competitive levels across the remaining EA scope. We also introduced competitive context — documenting that two of the undeployed security modules had functional equivalents available through the firm's existing Microsoft E5 licences — as negotiating leverage. For more on how IT Negotiations approaches Cisco engagements, see our Cisco advisory service and enterprise agreement negotiation pages.

The Results

The restructured Cisco EA was signed 12 weeks after IT Negotiations was engaged — three days before the original contract expiry deadline. The commercial outcome exceeded the firm's internal savings target by a significant margin:

Beyond the direct savings, the restructured EA established a significantly cleaner commercial baseline for the next renewal cycle. Module scope was aligned to actual deployment, user counts matched current headcount, and the firm secured contractual protections including a price cap on modules not subject to renewal growth and a right to adjust user counts annually. This structural discipline prevents the scope inflation dynamic that had been driving Cisco's pricing leverage in the previous cycle.

The gain-share engagement model — where IT Negotiations' fee is calculated as a percentage of validated savings — meant the firm bore no upfront cost. The engagement was self-funding from day one. See our True Cost of SaaS guide and Enterprise Negotiation Playbook for further frameworks applicable to complex EA renewals.

Related Resources

Free guides relevant to enterprise agreement negotiations: